On 28 January 2014 09:28, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > If cpufreq_register_driver() fails we would free the acpi driver > related structures but not free the ones allocated > by acpi_cpufreq_boost_init() function. This meant that as > the driver error-ed out and a CPU online/offline event came > we would crash and burn as one of the CPU notifiers would point > to garbage. > > This fixes a regression that commit cfc9c8ed03e4d908f2388af8815f44c87b503aaf > "acpi-cpufreq: Adjust the code to use the common boost attribute" > introduced. > > CC: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@xxxxxxxxxxx> > CC: Myungjoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@xxxxxxxxxxx> > CC: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> > CC: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx> > CC: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c | 5 +++-- > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
