That's ok. On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 7:26 PM, Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 06:39:52PM -0800, John Tobias wrote: >> The ARCH_HAS_CPUFREQ, HAVE_IMX_ANATOP and PM_OPP are moved up to ARCH_MCX. >> The driver should show if the SOC_IMX6Q and/or SOC_IMX6SL is/are selected. >> >> Signed-off-by: John Tobias <john.tobias.ph@xxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm >> index 3ba5dcc..230c663 100644 >> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm >> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm >> @@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ config ARM_HIGHBANK_CPUFREQ >> >> config ARM_IMX6Q_CPUFREQ >> tristate "Freescale i.MX6 cpufreq support" >> - depends on ARCH_MXC >> + depends on SOC_IMX6Q || SOC_IMX6SL > > No. We do not want to touch this line where there is another IMX6xx can > reuse the driver. Depending on ARCH_MXC is good enough, since we > already have the symbol prompt and help text to tell the targets that > the driver supports. > > Shawn > >> depends on REGULATOR_ANATOP >> help >> This adds cpufreq driver support for Freescale i.MX6 series SoCs. >> -- >> 1.8.3.2 >> > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
