On Saturday, January 04, 2014 07:48:13 PM Gleb Natapov wrote: > On Sat, Jan 04, 2014 at 06:38:59PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > Il 04/01/2014 15:38, Rafael J. Wysocki ha scritto: > > > Well, it's just a sanity check and it makes the problem go away for the reporter. > > > > > >> > Your patch is welcome but perhaps it should have a WARN_ON too. > > > It has been pulled in already, so the WARN_ON() can only be added via a separate > > > patch now. Would you like to prepare that patch? > > > > Yes, I'll add it together with the CPUID check. I'll send the patch so > > that it can get into 3.14. > > > CPUID check, while correct, will sweep the problem under the rug. Current > Linux logic should detect non working pstate in KVM. We should look into > why this is not happening for nested. I agree. It's better not to use CPUID for that in my opinion. Thanks! -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
