Il 03/01/2014 23:46, Rafael J. Wysocki ha scritto: > Well, fixing the KVM bug is surely welcome. > > That said, adding checks to ensure that your assumptions are valid is rarely > wrong, especially if they are done once per kernel boot. And the kernel only > should panic if it cannot continue to run, which isn't the case here. I agree, but I suspect even your check is already late. Your patch is welcome but perhaps it should have a WARN_ON too. Paolo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
