[Bug 65501] Blind angle of 1% between up_threshold and down_threshold

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65501

--- Comment #15 from sworddragon2@xxxxxxx ---
> This must be based on the reasoning that we don't have to go to max freq for loads as low as 10%.

Except the process splits up in several "small" threads. For example on Flash I
get only half of the performance with the default value. Either I could use the
performance governor to solve this issue (and loose the ability to save power)
or lower MIN_FREQUENCY_UP_THRESHOLD.

But I would still prefer to let the user decide what he wants to use (there
could always pop up new cases for users that want a lower value). Normally
having such a freedom was the choice I have abandoned Windows over 3 years ago
:)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Devel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux