[Bug 65501] Blind angle of 1% between up_threshold and down_threshold

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65501

--- Comment #6 from Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to sworddragon2 from comment #5)
> I'm talking about ondemand and it had in the past down_threshold.

I don't think it ever had it. I checked 2.6.30 and 3.0.. they don't have it. :)

> Just for clarification: If there is no down_threshold anymore how will the
> cpu scale down its frequency? I was simply assuming that this will happen
> now at 10%.

No, that's not right. We will go to max frequency if load has increased over
up_threshold, otherwise freq will be proportional to load.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Devel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux