On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 7:25 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I think you haven't missed any of them. > > That said, you need to do this in patch [1/2], or the kernel between > patches [1/2] and [2/2] may be broken on some systems. > > If you want to do that in separate patches, the current [2/2] should be > [1/2] and vice versa. > > I guess they will apply in the reverse order? No, definition of CPUFREQ_SKIP_INITIAL_FREQ_CHECK would be missing then after the first patch.. Anyway, I have fixed that and resent them now.. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
