On 28 November 2013 19:53, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I don't think that the Nishanth's issue is fixed by this particular version of > the patch, so I modified the changelog and removed a the comment above > cpufreq_suspend() No, it does fix his issue as we are just stopping the governors from dpm_suspend_noirq() and not initiating any new transitions. I said we need these calls from dpm_suspend() instead as platforms like exynos and tegra do need to change frequency before suspending.. See: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/25/692 > (which should be a proper kerneldoc one if any, BTW). Okay.. I will add that separately.. > I've also made some minor changes to the conditionals, because I didn't like them > the way they were written originally. > > Please check the result in bleeding-edge. Everything else is fine.. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
