On 27 November 2013 07:12, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Anyway, if you did what I asked you to do and put the cpufreq suspend/resume > into dpm_suspend/resume_noirq(), I'd probably take this for 3.13. However, > since you've decided to put those things somewhere else thus making the > change much more intrusive, I can only queue it up for 3.14. > > This means I'm going to take the Tianyu's patch as a stop gap for 3.13. There were design issues with that patch actually, as I pointed out earlier (handling EXIT part in core and INIT in governors).. And so in case we need to get something for v3.13, I will send a short version of this series with callbacks from suspend_noirq. Get that one instead. -- viresh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
