On 20 November 2013 20:29, Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx> wrote: > With the current governors that we have in upstream, the only one of > my concern has been userspace governor, but based on your comment > earlier in the thread, this is considered an non-issue since userspace > must trigger transition. However, this does put the SoC at risk > depending on distro and custom governors used. > > If the opinion is that we dont care about these, well.. I can end my > complaints and depend on the stats to tell me if an unknown frequency > was ever attempted for debug (even though I might personally not be > too excited about it). I wouldn't say that I was against this patch, but it looked like we could live without it as well.. But I also feel that there is some amount of uncertainty here and specially with userspace governor.. So, just see the patch which I have floated as replacement for few of the patches we have been talking about.. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
