On Friday, November 15, 2013 02:13:26 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 15 November 2013 11:24, Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > The related code has been changed and the comment is out of data.
> > So remove it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c | 4 ----
> > 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
> > index 0806c31..e6be635 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
> > @@ -328,10 +328,6 @@ int cpufreq_governor_dbs(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> > dbs_data->cdata->gov_dbs_timer);
> > }
> >
> > - /*
> > - * conservative does not implement micro like ondemand
> > - * governor, thus we are bound to jiffes/HZ
> > - */
> > if (dbs_data->cdata->governor == GOV_CONSERVATIVE) {
> > cs_dbs_info->down_skip = 0;
> > cs_dbs_info->enable = 1;
>
> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
Queued up for the next PM pull request, thanks!
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
