On 25 October 2013 18:26, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Having considered that a bit I think that I'd prefer one patch doing all of > these changes in one go (and with all applicable ACKs collected), one of the > reasons being that if it is necessary to revert that stuff, whatever the > reason, it will be much easier to do that with just one commit than with > 34 of them. With a similar reason I think the probability is more that a revert might be required for individual drivers as they may need to switch back to ->target() instead of ->target_index() and so keeping them separate might be better. In case we need to revert all patches due to some breakage, we can always do that in a single commit if required. What do you say? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
