On 10/03/2013 08:05 AM, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote: [...] >> However, could you squash this to patch #2 -> having implementation >> and binding together is better for git log history. >> > Based on some arguments on the other threads[1] on devicetree list, I thought > having separate patches for binding and driver changes is preferred. Hence the > split, I am OK either way. Thanks for pointing the discussion out. /me might rant about this ;) -> if someone has a strong opinion about this, they should probably propose a change to submitting patches guideline.. Grr.. I leave this to Rafael as to how he'd like this to be squashed/split > > Can I add your ACK/Reviewed-by otherwise ? > > Regards, > Sudeep > > [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg04855.html > -- Regards, Nishanth Menon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
