On 3 October 2013 14:27, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Agreed, but there's no cluster node in DT. So platforms using DT would have > these clocks in cpu@n node as it's used for CPU frequency scaling. One example I > can see is highbank(it uses cpufreq-cpu0 meaning its single cluster clock). So > AFAICT if any big-little systems wants to pass cluster clocks through DT, it has > to be cpu@n nodes. Let me know if you have any alternate thoughts ? I understand your point, but shouldn't we name it then: cpu clock? Probably cluster clock was wrong from the beginning.. As there is no cluster clock, or there is ? :) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
