On Tuesday 24 of September 2013 15:58:06 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote: > Hi, > > On 24/09/13 14:50, Mateusz Krawczuk wrote: > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/samsung,s5pv210-clock.txt > > @@ -0,0 +1,75 @@ > > +* Samsung S5PC110/S5PV210 Clock Controller > > + > > +The S5PV210 clock controller generates and supplies clock to various controllers > > +within the SoC. The clock binding described here is applicable to all SoCs in > > +the S5PC110/S5PV210 family. > > + > > +Required Properties: > > + > > +- compatible: should be "samsung,s5pv210-clock". > > I have nothing against this compatible value, but wouldn't it be more > accurate to use, e.g. "samsung,s5pv210-cmu" - for Clock Management Unit, > as this IP block is also referred to in the documentation ? > > May just be me, but "samsung,s5pv210-clock" sounds like just one > specific clock type. In the user's manual I have, this IP is referred to either as "CMU", as you suggested, or simply as "clock controller". "CMU" is not very meaningfull, so "samsung,s5pv210-clock-controller" would be the best here I guess, but for consistency with other Samsung's clock bindings, I'd suggest leaving this as is in the patch. Best regards, Tomasz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
