On Tuesday, September 17, 2013 09:48:08 PM Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 17 September 2013 20:50, Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 09/11/2013 11:25 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > >> This broke after a recent change "cedb70a cpufreq: Split __cpufreq_remove_dev() > >> into two parts" from Srivatsa.. > >> > >> Consider a scenario where we have two CPUs in a policy (0 & 1) and we are > >> removing cpu 1. On the call to __cpufreq_remove_dev_prepare() we have cleared 1 > >> from policy->cpus and now on a call to __cpufreq_remove_dev_finish() we read > >> cpumask_weight of policy->cpus, which will come as 1 and this code will behave > >> as if we are removing the last cpu from policy :) > >> > >> Fix it by clearing cpu mask in __cpufreq_remove_dev_finish() instead of > >> __cpufreq_remove_dev_prepare(). > > > > I see this patch isn't in linux-next yet, nor did it make 3.12-rc1. I > > assume it'll make 3.12-rc2? It solves various CPU hotplug and > > suspend/resume issues for me. > > Yes, I have asked Rafael to get this in for rc2 and few others too.. > Waiting for his reply though.. Care to remind me what the other patches were? Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
