Re: cpufreq and QEMU guests

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 05:46:04PM +0200, Benoît Canet wrote:
> Le Monday 16 Sep 2013 à 18:32:39 (+0300), Gleb Natapov a écrit :
> > On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 05:05:45PM +0200, Benoît Canet wrote:
> > > Le Monday 16 Sep 2013 à 09:39:10 (-0500), Alexander Graf a écrit :
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Am 16.09.2013 um 07:15 schrieb Benoît Canet <benoit.canet@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
> > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Hello,
> > > > > 
> > > > > I know a cloud provider worried about the fact that the /proc/cpuinfo of his
> > > > > guests give a bogus frequency to his customer.
> > > > > 
> > > > > QEMU and the guests kernel currently have no way to reflect the host frequency
> > > > > changes to the guests.
> > > > > 
> > > > > The customer compute intensive application then read this information and take
> > > > > wrong decisions.
> > > > 
> > > > Why do they care about the frequency? Is it for scheduling workloads? The only other case I can think of would be the TSC and that should be fixed frequency these days.
> > > > 
> > > > If it's scheduling, you could maybe expose the unavailable compute time as steal time to the guest. Exposibg frequency in a virtual environment feels backwards.
> > > 
> > > The final customer have a compute intensive workload.
> > > At startup the code retrieve the cpu cache topology, the cpu model, and various
> > > informations including the guest cpu frequency before starting the compute job.
> > > The QEMU instance typicaly use -cpu host.
> > > 
> > > The code inspects the cpu frequency has seen by the guests to choose the number
> > > of vms to instanciate to compute the given task.
> > I am not sure I understand. They look at guest cpu frequency to estimate
> > guest's performance?
> 
> Yes they take guest cpu count, model and frequency to estimate the performance
> of the guest.
> Next they cluster enough guests to be able to compute the job in a given time by
> using this estimate.
> 
They do it wrong. They should take guest cpu count, host cpu model and
frequency, pcpu/vcpu over commit (if any), guest/host memory overcommit
(if any) and estimate performance based on this. For pure computational
performance guest core performance should be close to host core
performance if there is not cpu/memory overcommit. With a lot of IO
things become more complicated.

--
			Gleb.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Devel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux