On 14 September 2013 04:22, Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I wonder if this series is bisectable? Perhaps I should just go and read > the rest of the series, but I presume there's a patch somewhere else > that adds those two cpufreq_notify_transition() to the cpufreq core. > Either that happens before this patch (in which case listeners will get > two notifications each time; perhaps that is safe?), or after this patch > (in which case with just this patch applied, no notifications will be > sent until a later patch! Hmm.. Good Catch.. So, yes git bisect would be compilable but not runnable.. As we are already serialized notifications and so two PRE notifications will generate a crash.. But I don't want to get all that in a single patch as that would be: 40 files changed, 192 insertions(+), 623 deletions(-) And that would be hard to review it.. Any suggestions? > Aside from that, all the Tegra-specific patches in this series, > Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxx> Thanks.. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
