On 13 September 2013 21:45, Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The patch to which I'm replying removes the above calls. These calls are > necessary to shutdown various bits of CPU-clock dependent hardware > before changing the CPU clock, and restore them - reconfiguring them > for the new clock rate after the transition has happened. > > So, if you're removing these calls, what replaces them? I don't see > anything which does without the above set. The other patch on which you commented about unnecessary read locks being taken: [PATCH 181/228] cpufreq: move freq change notifications to cpufreq That calls these notifiers, for all platforms except the ones that have set CPUFREQ_ASYNC_NOTIFICATION, before and after calling ->target_index().. And so functionally the code is supposed to be the same.. Unless I have done some stupid mistake.. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
