On 11/09/13 09:42, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 11 September 2013 13:45, Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@xxxxxx> wrote: >> Noone else seems to complain, but I don't think these =20, =09 etc. codes >> have been invented on my side and I don't think they belong here. I'm >> handling enough mails / patches daily to believe, that my mail system >> isn't the cause of this. Could you please verify and regenerate and >> resend? Unless I'm mistaken this looks like a corruption on your SMTP >> side. > > Its on Sudeep's side :) .. Or on ARM's side.. > Don't know why nobody else complained, Atleast people who test these > patches (Like Shawn), must have applied them from mail.. Don't know > why they aren't shouting :) > > He mostly send pull requests to Rafael and so this wasn't a issue for > Rafael :) > Yes looks like its at my end. I will try to fix it. There is alternate SMTP which should not have this issue, but it was down recently. I forgot to switch back to it once it was fixed. For now you can fetch it from: git://linux-arm.org/linux-skn.git cpufreq_fixes_v3.12 Regards, Sudeep -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
