That is some important piece of information that might be useful for others and so cc'ing LKML and other lists.. On 11 September 2013 01:06, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tuesday, September 10, 2013 02:16:03 PM Lukasz Majewski wrote: >> For my curiosity - what is the difference between bleeding-edge and >> linux-next branches at kernel_pm? > > linux-next are patches that I'm going to push to Linus in the future and that > have passed automated build testing. I still may drop one of them occasionally > or add tags to commits and rebase the branch as a result, though. > > bleeding-edge is linux-next plus patches under automated build testing, but it > may contain some purely experimental stuff too. During a merge window, like > for example today, it also may contain material for the second next release > (like 3.13 at the moment). > > In addition to those, there are topic branches like pm-cpufreq, acpica etc. > that are only material either in the Linus' tree already or going to be pushed > to Linus going forward and I don't rebase them. > > So if you want a stable branch to work on top of, either use one of the topic > branches (but please note that they may be somewhat behind Linus sometimes), or > ask me for one directly. > > Thanks, > Rafael > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
