On Sunday, September 01, 2013 09:30:49 PM Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 1 September 2013 18:58, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sunday, September 01, 2013 10:56:02 AM Viresh Kumar wrote: > >> We can't take a big lock around __cpufreq_governor() as this causes recursive > >> locking for some cases. But calls to this routine must be serialized for every > >> policy. > > > > Care to explain here why it must be serialized? > > Yes, added that to the attached patches (Added reported-by too): OK, the attached patches queued up for 3.12. Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
