Re: [Query] CPUFreq: Why do we need policy->user_policy?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 28 August 2013 02:50, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 27, 2013 10:04:52 PM Lan Tianyu wrote:

>> From my understanding.policy->min/max may be modified by some drivers
>> but the user_policy only store user space config and should not be changed
>> by other reason.  :)
>
> Yes, that was the original idea IIRC, so separate user settings from stuff that
> may be changed internally by the kernel.

Yeah, that's what I understood too now.. Anyway I am going to do some core
cleanups now, drivers are mostly done and will see if something can be done
to get rid of them... Otherwise will keep them as is.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Devel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux