Re: [Query] CPUFreq: Why do we need policy->user_policy?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2013/8/26 Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx>:
> On Monday, August 26, 2013 08:00:52 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> Hi Rafael,
>
> Hi,
>
>> I am almost done with cleanup of drivers and am back at cpufreq core.. :)
>> I got to this structure: struct cpufreq_real_policy;
>>
>> And I am not able to understand what's the need for this structure?
>> Can you let me know? Before I try to get rid of it :)
>
> Honestly, I don't remember from the top of my head.

So far as I know, it stores some user's config and cpufreq_update_policy()
bases on the data in the struct to start a new policy. Cpu thermal driver
(/driver/thermal/cpu_cooling.c)also will its value to update freq policy
when receive a cpufreq policy adjust notification.

>
> Thanks,
> Rafael
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



-- 
Best regards
Tianyu Lan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Devel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux