On Mon, 26 Aug 2013 11:03:51 +0530 Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx
wrote,
> On 13 August 2013 15:38, Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> > diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> > index b5defd4..ec19da9 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> > @@ -408,10 +408,24 @@ int cpufreq_frequency_table_target(struct
> > cpufreq_policy *policy,
> >
> > void cpufreq_frequency_table_update_policy_cpu(struct
> > cpufreq_policy *policy); ssize_t cpufreq_show_cpus(const struct
> > cpumask *mask, char *buf); +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ
> > int cpufreq_boost_trigger_state(int state);
> > int cpufreq_boost_supported(void);
> > int cpufreq_boost_enabled(void);
> > -
> > +#else
> > +static inline int cpufreq_boost_trigger_state(int state)
> > +{
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +static inline int cpufreq_boost_supported(void)
> > +{
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +static inline int cpufreq_boost_enabled(void)
> > +{
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +#endif
>
> I almost gave an Ack before I saw this :)
> This should be moved to the first patch I believe..
Ok, I will move it there.
--
Best regards,
Lukasz Majewski
Samsung R&D Institute Poland (SRPOL) | Linux Platform Group
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
