On 24 August 2013 04:45, Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@xxxxxx> wrote: > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c > index ad1fde2..ede6487 100644 > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c > @@ -20,6 +20,9 @@ > #include <linux/platform_device.h> > #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h> > #include <linux/slab.h> > +#include <linux/thermal.h> > +#include <linux/cpu_cooling.h> > +#include <linux/cpumask.h> In alphabetical order please.. > @@ -268,6 +272,13 @@ static int cpu0_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > goto out_free_table; > } > > + /* > + * For now, just loading the cooling device; > + * thermal DT code takes care of matching them. > + */ > + if (of_find_property(np, "cooling-zones", NULL)) > + cdev = cpufreq_cooling_register(cpu_present_mask); Should we check if it passed or failed? And if failed Atleast flag an appropriate message? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
