On Saturday, August 24, 2013 09:50:06 AM Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 24 August 2013 01:10, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Friday, August 23, 2013 09:20:35 PM Viresh Kumar wrote: > >> CPUFreq drivers that use clock frameworks interface,i.e. clk_get_rate(), to get > >> CPUs clk rate, has similar sort of code used for most of them. > >> > >> This patchset adds a generic ->get() which will do the same thing for them. All > >> those drivers are required to now is to set .get to cpufreq_generic_get() and > >> set their clk pointer in policy->clk during ->init(). > >> > >> Later part of this patchset fixes 17 drivers with this change. > >> > >> That's part 7 of my generic cleanups for CPUFreq core, first six are here: > > > > And that's the last one for 3.13, right? > > 3.13 is too far, can't promise that really :) OK, let me rephrase that more directly: Please, slow down. Allow your previous changes to be integrated before you throw more of them at people. Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
