On 20/08/13 15:01, Nishanth Menon wrote: > On 08/20/2013 05:00 AM, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote: [...] >> Until we get more feedback and agreement on new proposal can we have >> this simple amendment in this patch to the existing binding ? Since the >> new proposal[1] is backward compatible(this patch adding support for >> option#5 to existing option#1), we will have to add support for other >> binding options in [1] later. >> >> This is needed to support shared OPPs with simple/single OPP profile >> and also to fix the broken and unused binding >> @Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/arm_big_little_dt.txt >> >> Regards, >> Sudeep >> >> [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/cpufreq/msg06563.html > > > Could you post a non-RFC version of this series? As I had mentioned > earlier in the thread, I dont mind having this pulled in as stage 1 of > the transition to a more elaborate solution. > Thanks Nishanth. I would wait till Mark and Stephen agree for this approach. Regards, Sudeep -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
