On Tuesday, August 13, 2013 07:01:04 PM Viresh Kumar wrote: > Hi Rafael/Russell, > > These patches would be part of this patchset finally, sending it separately as I > didn't wanted to send other patches in that series.. > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/8/10/48 > > (Above series was rebased over https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/8/8/263 and hence this > patchset too).. > > These first exposes frequency table and then uses cpufreq generic routines > (which uses exposed table) instead of its own .verify() routine. > > Later I will send another patch that would be part of this series: > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2013/8/12/406 > > (I need to send that series again today and so not sending that patch twice, > once here and then in that series).. > > All these patches are pushed here with all dependencies: > > https://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=people/vireshk/linux.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/for-v3.13 Are the three patches in this series prerequisite for the big target_index one? If so, I think they can go into 3.12 actually, if they are ACKed by the appropriate platform maintainers. > Viresh Kumar (3): > cpufreq: sa11x0: Expose frequency table > cpufreq: sa11x0: let cpufreq core initialize struct policy fields > cpufreq: sa11x0: Use generic cpufreq routines > > arch/arm/mach-sa1100/generic.c | 65 +++++++++++++--------------------------- > arch/arm/mach-sa1100/generic.h | 2 +- > drivers/cpufreq/sa1100-cpufreq.c | 9 +++--- > drivers/cpufreq/sa1110-cpufreq.c | 9 +++--- > 4 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-) Thanks, Rafael -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
