On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 10:52:00AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > Over that it would have been useful if we could have this patch as part > of the series you posted for defining devm_regulator_get_optional(), > and so we could have seen what's that patch is doing.. It's in -next. There's rather a lot of regulator users in the kernel.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
