Re: [PATCH 29/44] cpufreq: pcc: Use generic cpufreq routines

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10 August 2013 12:14, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Most of the CPUFreq drivers do similar things in .exit() and .verify() routines
> and .attr. So its better if we have generic routines for them which can be used
> by cpufreq drivers then.
>
> This patch uses these generic routines for this driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/pcc-cpufreq.c | 9 +--------
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-)

My patch was wrong.. It was based on the assumption that everybody who
had implemented a .target() also implements a frequency table and exposes
it.. And the generic routines I have exposed depend on that frequency table.
And this cpufreq driver doesn't expose that freq table...

And so this patch is dropped :(
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Devel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux