On 10 August 2013 12:14, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Most of the CPUFreq drivers do similar things in .exit() and .verify() routines > and .attr. So its better if we have generic routines for them which can be used > by cpufreq drivers then. > > This patch uses these generic routines for this driver. > > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/cpufreq/pcc-cpufreq.c | 9 +-------- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-) My patch was wrong.. It was based on the assumption that everybody who had implemented a .target() also implements a frequency table and exposes it.. And the generic routines I have exposed depend on that frequency table. And this cpufreq driver doesn't expose that freq table... And so this patch is dropped :( -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html