Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: cpufreq-cpu0: NULL is a valid regulator

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 9 August 2013 23:36, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Since NULL could in theory be a valid regulator we ought to check for
> IS_ERR() rather than for NULL. In practice this is unlikely to be an
> issue but it's better for neatness.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c | 9 ++++-----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

Makes sense.

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Devel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux