On 08/09/2013 11:09 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 9 August 2013 21:49, Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 08/08/2013 10:04 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: >>> On 8 August 2013 21:37, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> Its useless and the correct routine isn't called at all :) .. I will add that >>>> additional patch and send it to you and will get this change out of this >>>> commit. >>> >>> The two commits look like this now attached too in case you want >>> to test: >> >> I'd be happy to test, but those changes cause build failures on top of >> next-20130809. Which other patches do I need to apply first? > > None.. You applied all three attached patches? I have given it a try > on my side now and it worked without any issues.. > > Just pushed out a branch for you as well: > > https://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=people/vireshk/linux.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/tegra-test Well, I don't see any issues running this, although the cpufreq sysfs files seem to have disappeared on Tegra, even without your changes, so I'm not sure how to really verify cpufreq. Did the sysfs files go away, or do I need to investigate why/when the disappeared? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
