Re: ignore_nice vs. ignore_nice_load

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: ignore_nice vs. ignore_nice_load
From: Martin von Gagern <Martin.vGagern@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2013 09:40:13 +0200
Cc: cpufreq@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <CAOh2x=kriqCRp9x+f5f5onDVoyfxVHSPDF5HrM_sFSsQ1ucktw@mail.gmail.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130805 Thunderbird/17.0.7

On 05.08.2013 09:01, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Please try following patch (attached for applying).
> [0001-cpufreq-rename-ignore_nice-as-ignore_nice_load.patch]

Looks good here.

Thanks,
 Martin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

References:
- ignore_nice vs. ignore_nice_load
  - From: Martin von Gagern
- Re: ignore_nice vs. ignore_nice_load
  - From: Viresh Kumar

Prev by Date: Re: sysfs support for scaling_cur_freq in intel_pstate
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v3 05/16] ARM: mvebu: remove device tree parsing for cpu nodes
Previous by thread: Re: ignore_nice vs. ignore_nice_load
Next by thread: [PATCH 00/10] CPUFreq: Fixes & Cleanups for 3.12
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel Devel] [Linux USB Devel] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite Forum] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux