On Saturday, August 03, 2013 10:45:04 PM Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 3 August 2013 17:19, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > This patch intends to cleanup following issues in the header files included in > > cpufreq core layers: > > - Include headers in ascending order, so that we don't add same multiple times > > by mistake. > > - <asm/> must be included after <linux/>, so that they override whatever they > > need. > > - Remove unnecessary header files > > - Don't include files already included by cpufreq.h or cpufreq_governor.h > > > > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Fixup due to compilation warning reported by Fengguang's kbuild system: > [Latest stuff pushed in my cpufreq-next branch] > > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c > index 70399ea..ccaf025 100644 > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c > @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ > > #include <linux/cpu.h> > #include <linux/cpufreq.h> > +#include <linux/delay.h> > #include <linux/device.h> > #include <linux/init.h> > #include <linux/kernel_stat.h> Can you please repost the complete patch with this folded in? Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
