Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] PM / OPP: add support to specify phandle of another node for OPP

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/31/2013 08:46 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
...
> Let me try to explain since SoCs such as OMAP/AM family dont make life
> trivial :)..
> 
> An legacy example[1][2]
> 
> SoC DM explains that the chip is capable of X opps:
> opp1, 2 - for all devices
> opp1,2, 3 - if efuse bit X@y is set
> opp1,2,3,4 - if efuse bit X@y is set AND Board design meets SoC vendors
> requirements (including additional features A, B is enabled).

Hopefully the text "board design meets SoC vendors requirements" means
something like "the board has a big fan capable of dissipating a lot of
heat" and not "the board manufacturer paid us a lot of money to license
the 'go faster' feature". The former could well be suitable to represent
in DT, the latter not.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Devel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux