On 30 July 2013 19:28, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tuesday, July 30, 2013 07:06:33 PM Viresh Kumar wrote: >> We call cpufreq_cpu_get() in cpufreq_add_dev_symlink() to increase usage >> refcount of policy and not to get policy for a cpu. So, we don't really need to >> capture the return value of this routine and call put for it later for failure >> cases. We can simply use policy passed as an argument to this routine. >> >> Moreover debug print is rewritten to make it more clear. >> >> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Both [1-2/2] look good, but what do they apply to? Mainline, linux-next, > my bleeding-edge branch? Sorry for not mentioning this, bleeding-edge :) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
