On 26 July 2013 18:44, Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx> wrote: > As far as I am concerned, the original argument Shawn made[1] is convincing > enough for me. > > Will probably look at Viresh and others to see if there is a change in > opinion. I would say that the earlier comments "a real hardware device is required for a node to be present in DT" still stands and so this patch doesn't introduce anything new. @Rob: What do you think about getting a DT node for probing cpufreq driver? We surely need some way without declaring a platform device to get driver probed.. Or if we can put this information in the cpu node, which we don't have to replicate in all cpus.. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
