On 07/28/2013 01:38 PM, Toralf Förster wrote: > On 07/28/2013 01:39 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> On Saturday, July 27, 2013 07:40:34 PM Toralf Förster wrote: >>> it gives at a ThinkPad T420: >>> >>> tfoerste@n22 ~/tmp $ lsmod | grep ^acpi_cpufreq >>> acpi_cpufreq 12902 2147483647 >> >> That is -1, which indicates some module refcount woes. >> >> I definitely can't see that with the mainline on my machines. > > It might be a regression in -stable only, b/c in 3,10.2 I did not > observed it. > > Srivatsa, > > by any chance - could the revert of the cpufreq patches have something > to do with that ? > Hmmm? Those reverts didn't touch anything related to module refcounts.. So I don't think they have anything to do with this. Also, is the issue related to suspend/resume at all? (Sorry, I don't have your original email, so I'm not sure what the exact issue is). Regards, Srivatsa S. Bhat -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
