On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 04:02:32PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 2 July 2013 15:59, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > If you're forced to do stuff like that then don't include the patch in > > the body of the e-mail, it just makes everything worse. Not only is the > > copy in the body of the e-mail broken but there's now two copies so > > tools like git am get even more upset as they may potentially see some > > of the hunks twice. > I do it so that people can review it. I still believe its important. If your patch is sent as a text/plain attachment most mail clients will tend to do the right thing with replies, at least the good ones. Or just figure out a VPN or something to get round the firewall issues, mobile broadband is often a good technique if there's no carry restrictions (usually phones are allowed...).
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
