On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 16:33:30 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 19 June 2013 22:42, Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c > > b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c > > > static unsigned int acpi_pstate_strict; > > -static bool boost_enabled, boost_supported; > > +static bool boost_enabled; > > Instead of this variable use cpufreq_boost_enabled() directly. OK. > > And then this patch may change as well.. > > I couldn't find any more issues with this patch but some Intel guy > must review it. Yes, indeed Intel review is welcome. -- Best regards, Lukasz Majewski Samsung R&D Institute Poland (SRPOL) | Linux Platform Group -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
