Hi Viresh
Thanks for your review.
On 2013年06月25日 11:56, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 25 June 2013 07:36, Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> diff --git a/Documentation/cpu-freq/user-guide.txt b/Documentation/cpu-freq/user-guide.txt
>> index ff2f283..0cc72f7 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/cpu-freq/user-guide.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/cpu-freq/user-guide.txt
>> @@ -196,6 +196,10 @@ affected_cpus : List of Online CPUs that require software
>> related_cpus : List of Online + Offline CPUs that need software
>> coordination of frequency.
>>
>> +freqdomain_cpus : List of Online + Offline CPUs in same CPU dependency
>> + domain. (This is only available for acpi-cpufreq
>> + driver)
>> +
>
> This is generic file, don't add this information here. Add this in
> acpi-cpufreq file.
I don't find acpi-cpufreq.txt under
Documentation/cpu-freq/acpi-cpufreq.txt. So I should create it?
>
>> scaling_driver : Hardware driver for cpufreq.
>>
>> scaling_cur_freq : Current frequency of the CPU as determined by
>> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
>> index 17e3496..b859997 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
>> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
>> @@ -176,6 +176,16 @@ static struct global_attr global_boost = __ATTR(boost, 0644,
>> show_global_boost,
>> store_global_boost);
>>
>> +static ssize_t show_freqdomain_cpus(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, char *buf)
>> +{
>> + struct acpi_cpufreq_data *data = per_cpu(acfreq_data, policy->cpu);
>> + struct acpi_processor_performance *perf = data->acpi_data;
>> +
>> + return cpufreq_show_cpus(perf->shared_cpu_map, buf);
>> +}
>
> I am not sure if this is enough. Check this commit:
>
> aa77a52764a92216b61a6c8079b5c01937c046cd
>
> It had these changes:
Please see the acpi_processor_preregister_performance() in the
drivers/acpi/processor_perlib.c. All cpus in the same dependency domain
are stored in the perf->shared_cpu_map(including the reference cpu the
perf belongs to). Original code will copy shared_cpu_map to
policy->related_cpus, do cpumask_or between policy->related_cpus and
policy->cpus in the cpufreq_add_dev() and store the result into
policy->related_cpus. Expose the data via related_cpus.
For acpi-cpufreq driver, the shared_cpu_map is the biggest subset since
it regardless the coordination type.
After the commit aa77a5, only the cpus in the software or
software&hardware coordination type dependency domain will copy to
policy->cpus and finally store into policy->related_cpus in the
cpufreq_add_dev() by cpumask_or. And then we miss the cpus in the
hardware coordination type domain. But these info is still stored in the
policy->shared_cpu_map. Does this make sense?
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
> index 937bc28..57a8774 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
> @@ -730,7 +730,6 @@ static int acpi_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct
> cpufreq_policy *policy)
> policy->shared_type == CPUFREQ_SHARED_TYPE_ANY) {
> cpumask_copy(policy->cpus, perf->shared_cpu_map);
> }
> - cpumask_copy(policy->related_cpus, perf->shared_cpu_map);
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> dmi_check_system(sw_any_bug_dmi_table);
> @@ -742,7 +741,6 @@ static int acpi_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct
> cpufreq_policy *policy)
> if (check_amd_hwpstate_cpu(cpu) && !acpi_pstate_strict) {
> cpumask_clear(policy->cpus);
> cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, policy->cpus);
> - cpumask_copy(policy->related_cpus, cpu_sibling_mask(cpu));
> policy->shared_type = CPUFREQ_SHARED_TYPE_HW;
> pr_info_once(PFX "overriding BIOS provided _PSD data\n");
>
--
Best regards
Tianyu Lan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
