2013/6/12 Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>: > On 12 June 2013 14:39, Xiaoguang Chen <chenxg@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> ret = policy->governor->governor(policy, event); > > We again reached to the same problem. We shouldn't call > this between taking locks, otherwise recursive locks problems > would be seen again. But this is not the same lock as the deadlock case, it is a new lock, and only used in this function. no other functions use this lock. I don't know how can we get dead lock again? Thanks Xiaoguang -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
