https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58761 Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rjw@xxxxxxx --- Comment #12 from Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> 2013-05-30 16:05:03 --- (In reply to comment #11) > > Why I removed it was: "Nobody is making use of this information and was turning > > out to be more misleading".. As "hardware" for kernel is whatever is present > > below kernel layer.. So, if the layers below linux don't want to hide that > > information, let it be. > > I have actually been using these files for while for a project related with > energy in order to decide which cores have a physical correlation with respect > to frequency transition. So if I get it right, it is not possible to have such > information anymore. Yeah.. I am not sure if it is worth to add another field (only for acpi-cpufreq) to get this information back.. @Rafael: ?? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
