https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58761 --- Comment #6 from Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> 2013-05-30 15:05:19 --- (In reply to comment #5) > I am not entirely understand why the change was made (not required :-) but is > more accurate from my point of view. I didn't understood what was the use of related_cpus in kernel at all earlier.. Sent many mails across lists and didn't got a satisfactory answer.. Searched kernel source and nobody seemed to be using it (including cpufreq core).. And when I cleaned up the core finally it made more sense to use it in a separate way: i.e. have both online and offline cpus in it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
