On Wednesday, May 22, 2013 08:12:22 PM Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > Hi Rafael > > I don't see this patch in your cpufreq branch nor in next or Linus' trees, > has it been pulled yet? No, I haven't applied it yet, not sure why exactly. In the future it's better to CC cpufreq patches to linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx so that the kernel.org Patchwork can pick them up. I'm much less likely to overlook them then. This is a fix, so do we need it in 3.10-rc? Rafael > On Thu, 28 Mar 2013, Shawn Guo wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 11:46:38PM +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > > > Hi Shawn > > > > > > On Mon, 25 Feb 2013, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > > > > > > > clk_set_rate() isn't supposed to accept approximate frequencies, instead > > > > a supported frequency should be obtained from clk_round_rate() and then > > > > used to set the clock. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@xxxxxx> > > > > > > Can I have your ack for this one, please? > > > > Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > --- > Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D. > Freelance Open-Source Software Developer > http://www.open-technology.de/ -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
