On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 7:38 AM, <dirk.brandewie@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Add CPU ID's for supported Sandybridge and Ivybrigde processors. Hmm. Isn't 0x25 "Westmere"? Are the model numbers listed in some doc? I hate this "add random numbers (not even in order) without any logic to it". Here's the list we have of family six numbers from arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c (used for tlb-flushall crap): case 0x60f: /* original 65 nm celeron/pentium/core2/xeon, "Merom"/"Conroe" */ case 0x616: /* single-core 65 nm celeron/core2solo "Merom-L"/"Conroe-L" */ case 0x617: /* current 45 nm celeron/core2/xeon "Penryn"/"Wolfdale" */ case 0x61d: /* six-core 45 nm xeon "Dunnington" */ case 0x61a: /* 45 nm nehalem, "Bloomfield" */ case 0x61e: /* 45 nm nehalem, "Lynnfield" */ case 0x625: /* 32 nm nehalem, "Clarkdale" */ case 0x62c: /* 32 nm nehalem, "Gulftown" */ case 0x62e: /* 45 nm nehalem-ex, "Beckton" */ case 0x62f: /* 32 nm Xeon E7 */ case 0x62a: /* SandyBridge */ case 0x62d: /* SandyBridge, "Romely-EP" */ case 0x63a: /* Ivybridge */ so it has 0x25 as "Clarkdale" (what's Westmere vs Clarkdale? - Intel codenames always seem like a f*cking exercise in trying to confuse you). But not SB in any case. So we used to have the two SB cases listed (2a/2d). Your patch adds Clarkdale/Ivybridge (but not in the right order). What about the other ones? Linus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html