On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 1:04 AM, Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxx>
>
> I don't see how the virtual address of the tuners pointer would be of
> any help to anyone so remove it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
> index b0ffef96bf77..4b9bb5def6f1 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
> @@ -547,7 +547,6 @@ static int od_init(struct dbs_data *dbs_data)
> tuners->io_is_busy = should_io_be_busy();
>
> dbs_data->tuners = tuners;
> - pr_info("%s: tuners %p\n", __func__, tuners);
> mutex_init(&dbs_data->mutex);
> return 0;
> }
Sorry for this message :(
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
