On 05/07/2013 05:07 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, May 07, 2013 08:20:24 AM dirk.brandewie@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
From: dirk <dirk.brandewie@xxxxxxxxx>
All queued up for a post-3.10-rc1 push as 3.10 material, but I have a couple
of comments.
First, the patches didn't apply for me cleanly. I needed to fix up one of
them manually to make it apply and patch [5/6] didn't appear to be necessary
at all (it made changes that had been made previously). Please check the
bleeding-edge branch of my tree to see if the code is what you wanted and
let me know (either way).
Srinivas's commit d1b6848 collided with my 5/6 patch. my patches were based off
of v3.9. Which branch of yours should I base my submissions on?
linux-pm/bleeding-edge is correct.
Second, can you please CC your cpufreq submissions to linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx?
That will allow me to use Patchwork for managing them, which is much more
convenient than plain email.
No problem
--Dirk
Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
