On 04/09/2013 07:56 PM, Stratos Karafotis wrote:
On 04/05/2013 10:50 PM, Stratos Karafotis wrote:
Hi Viresh,
On 04/04/2013 07:54 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
Hi Stratos,
Yes, your results show some improvements. BUT if performance is the
only thing
we were looking for, then we will never use ondemand governor but
performance
governor.
I suspect this little increase in performance must have increased
power numbers
too (significantly). So, if you can get numbers in the form of
power/performance
with and without your patch, it will be great.
--
viresh
I run some more tests. I increased the number of iterations to 100
(from 20).
I also test for counter 1,000,000 (~4200us), 5,000,000 (~10000us),
15,000,000 (~30000us).
This time, I also extracted statistics from cpufreq_stats driver. I
think this will be an
indication for power consumption. Below the results and attached the
program I used for to
get these numbers.
Any comments would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Stratos
Ping.
Thanks,
Stratos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
